Stop Frequent Erections

Luther, resign! Herder, selection!

Confirmation Letter For Community Service

1917, Day Groundhog

What would fantasize who often travel in time, if not for contemporary art? I do not mean traveling to the future, but to the past. Specifically in 1917, and again with the same feeling that nothing has changed since then. best, the presenter at minute 8:25: "If you think we're going to teach them about contemporary art, and I'd like your opinion. The first video shows a toilet-care not-portrait of Marcel Duchamp, 1917. It is a sculpture entitled Fountain (source), which is ... well, a urinal. Is this art? " (I can assure that the program is a few months ago, in 1917 there was no YouTube). Stephen Hawking

While we do not resolve the matter , is what is (and is not little).

Penthouse Forum Letters Free Online

One thing I did not know before opening a blog like this is that you have it tested. One manages a space where everyone can say what you think, and temptations to modify the collective discourse is generated, are constant. I speak of course from where the views of the participants are contrary to oneself. Leaving aside the mere insults, there are many other interventions to justify censorship by the owner of a blog, or I think.

Many bloggers end up turning their blogs, perhaps unwittingly, in small Ministries of Propaganda in the service of his own image. There are those who shamelessly decided not to publish any dissenting voices ever. Others do so only when such interventions do not compromise the balance between "editorial" and criticism. In any case, it is to redesign public opinion to suit the interests of "moderator." It is unfortunate that this strategy reproach dictator and then act as if we have the power to decide who believes and who does not.

This leads me to a sad conclusion: there are many people who have a blog not to expose their views to criticism and try to learn something from them, but to reaffirm what we already think. Real thing, but then, why the possibility that other part? Just to receive praise? Why should you be issued a terse "Great post, so 'and also criticized a brief" Pathetic post, so'? Why are so many bloggers decide unilaterally terminate discussions with a "I do not care", without realizing that perhaps the other (or any reader of his blog) want to continue? Why so many pirra they have the last word, to the point of censoring all subsequent actions to which they conceived as a wonderful end of the debate? Of blogs where the author entries are usually answered by thirty laudatory comments, how many ranks first true unanimously laudatory? How many are in fact the product of careful purging?

There should be an Internet space in which to play the comments deleted and not published in blogs and forums, information stolen from public discussion. Would know more about the participant censored, but above all much more about the censor blogger.

All The Arrows On Ultimate I Spy

The value of democracy

My friend, teacher and editor Eduard Gonzalo sent me an article I do not want to stay in the drawer of memories in this time of historic triumph Sandro Rosell . Lean:

The elections for the presidency of FC Barcelona had its real beginning with the presentation of the candidacy of Sandro Rosell and the press conference convened by the next day in his clubhouse. It initially the candidate best positioned to win the presidency of the organization almost reeled all the main lines of its program of which just would depart in the course of days. Its reappearance media was accompanied by the publication of a survey, first in the weekly "Goal" and then in the newspaper El Periódico of Catalunya which gave a significant majority. Thereafter, all media were unanimous in assessing the outcome of the process would be given by the candidate may wear Rosell that hard could improve its expectations. While all the candidates tried to obtain the required signatures were some incidents of unequal importance and value but generally of little interest to members. One was the incomprehensible logic of the legal entity while Rosell forced to use the name on his birth certificate and not Alexandre Sandro as known by the mass incomprehensibly limited social presence of the auditors of the different candidates impede the efficiency of the process as the essential guarantee required by democratic processes. The matter was finally settled with respective resolutions of the Catalan Football Federation which gave in all cases the reason the team Rosell . Another issue that marked those days were two stories. One of them appeared in the newspaper Expansion and referred to the presentation of a public call for creditors of companies Marc Ingla . The second appeared in the blog " Amb pebre salt and" the former head of communications of Laporta ceased after the censure motion which was referred to the involvement of a company of Sandro Rosell in a case of administrative corruption in Brazil following the conclusion of a friendly match between Brazil and Portugal. The rights of friendly matches both combined. The first news was hardly discussed while the second tried to magnify. In fact it was investigating the diligence of the public ministry of Brasilia against legal malpractice committed by both the Governor of Brasilia as sports minister at the time of hire and bid due time and form the borrower of a service owned Rosell. It was simply what the law is known as Luso Acca Public Improvidade Civil Administration, is a request to initiate proceedings civil administrative oversights. The issue was magnified by some of the actors saying that Rosell was charged with five prosecutors, ignoring guess that is so pronounced that the process was being asked to accuse public entities have this requirement and has its origins in English law inherited. The lack of merits of the case was soon disappear from the media of communication .

The primary campaign ended with no surprises or surprisingly, depending on how you look at the issue. No surprises because it was expected and surprisingly because these things are usually always easier for candidacy official . That is, Rosell obtained a number of firms than harvested together for the rest of the applicants. After several days of impasse began the final week of the campaign to be held four debates between the four candidates who were perceived role in identifying the persuasive skills of the candidates to decide the votes of many undecided . The first debate was held at the Catalunya Radio under the baton of Manel Fuentes. The highlight of it was the attack that Marc Ingla initiated against Sandro Rosell, when even the moderator was doing the candidates a series of questions to establish an initial position. The rash of it was certainly equal to the anecdotal. Marc Ingla melodramatic phrases alternated as "Take Off mask" with others of a more mock paternalistic as "Do not feel ashamed to say that you are intrusive", "We know that you laid them ". All this to try to convey a concern I guess was perceived more as a rhetorical trick than something born of the conviction Sandro that if he wins the elections act as a kind of fierce Taliban while cutting heads around as if it were Sandokan. The truth is that if something does not have any paint Rosell is to be prone to excess. And finally, if something can be charged is warmth. Rosell weathered the storm without other impairment that give the impression that such controversy was far from the character of fine stylist who is credited with the team of his / our love. In his defense I must say that at the end of the campaign left the impression of being a rock and agile puncher. The props put the matter Agustí Benedito surprised with a casual and skilled speech but tough and somewhat superficial. That allowed him to point out that the model is not people and left Ingla quite exposed. And Rosell criticized for alleged willful but not match with any member of Boixos Nois . That was the main criticism addressed to him the favorite throughout the season although of course knew how to manage with the precision of a chemist and suspense of a detective novel writer. In the second debate distilled the second dose of cryptically saying that they would never vote to Rosell , allowing feint proposing a deal cautiously. The third day he asked timidly also if he had signed a paper with the members of that faction and the fourth day he said the Boixos were and had broken into his house as he predicts the imminent war Troy. Rosell , pulled out his best clothes of seriousness and conviction institutional and said with sincere attitude of condemning the violence. I for a moment I imagined the response would have been the true author of the concept of "zero violence", the speaker and unrelenting political Giuliani would have been something like: "Let me Mr. Benedito continue and intensify in the delicate fabric of their casuistry and tell police if you know who have been in my house can only be for reasons or either because they told it, which is you treat them carelessly, but not knowingly or be assured that I am convinced that it is not, or that you sent me. "

The second debate slave microphone that comes and goes . Strengthened the position of Rosell that might explain your project with remarkable consistency, made us excited about the Espai Barcelona and gave a slight tug on the wrist to the ruling party with delayed construction the of the new house. The low effectiveness of the barrage the day before he had to recommend him or his advisers to put Ursuline face and neatly shelling politically correct discourse of the ruling party. But that's not Rubalcaba ... Jaume Ferrer continued its spirit of "this is not me" or "the prodigal son this is a way to make the cousin."

The third debate was the most interesting. Me at least helped me realize the unbearable lightness of the theme of "model" and the accusation of "interventionism." Ingla returned to the attack and not face hurt a fly continued its strategy of fear, older than walking in, the ensuing chaos to change, which of course can not be anything but bad. Again appealed to the fear that we have the Catalans for someone else to break the rapture and happiness in recent times. And one he could hear something like, "You're a bad kid, really bad, Sandro . Remember that always replies to the Master. You remember the face of frustration that put this good man, that holy man called Txiqui , every time you dragged them out of your chromites belcebús . " You're going to fire even the cleaning lady evil being, I know ... Poor women, alcoholic husband, the children on drugs and your forces like a bull in a china shop, dismissing and the poor director of playtime, also fired, but cruelty to put all your buddies waiting at the door as evil gnomes in your project of chaos and destruction. Faced with such a theatrical attitude, Sandro Rosell that Tiger is nothing but stubborn enough elephant eventually forget that the discussions are not your thing, I keep on confusing entertain preambles of endless detours to , of escaping the melee, tedious refuge in the warmth that transmit their barracks, to depart from the script of his advisers stingy and ended the debate with the conviction that until then had failed to free up some Corset tightwad script advisors. Overall, the next day as well summarized Dagoberto Escorcia : "Three plans and a draft." The last debate. It was also quite curious. Firstly because I say with affection, if a guy you would never moderate a presidential debate is Lluís Canut . Person whom I know personally but that achieved by his honesty and barcelonismo all I'm very fond but when the tension seems that at any moment is going to eat his fists. Out again the same things, the trading cards Rosell, farmhouses Ingla global, the misery and greatness of outgoing president, the difficulties to discuss economy with precision and ease, we have normal people, partner, partner Sandro . However at the end of brashly slipped some things that are quite far away to not be a problem. For example, came up again the issue of Uzbekistan , a thorny issue, is again accused Sandro doing business in football, insisted Benedito Uzbekistan comparing with Qatar . Rosell endured watching the time, spare and went on tiptoe details about some things and missed some others. But then when the curtain falls you feel a slight discomfort in the stomach and assaulted her lucid little he has left. And he wonders whether business Rosell will not be an endless battlefield to divide the Barça , if we do well to tiptoe about our international sponsors or if it's true that we can separate football policy. Yes Look Herbalife is a pyramid, which in itself is disturbing, yet it is that from the English Health Ministry to numerous publications reputable scholars warn that the composition of their products contain hepatotoxic substances that can harm, including Ephedra issue, and if you look web page of such institution shall see Messi the forearm wearing that shirt spotless brand logo. And if it were, is that this beautiful day convention in Soriano signed with great fanfare, has the monopono is if I've fallen off the donkey and everyone knows or is the operator of telephony , which has a monopoly on communications in Arab Emirates and hiding behind religion and to protect children from pornography serves to censor the timid voices courage to defend freedom of the press, to prevent people to exchange ideas and opinions in social networking, that's ideas and concerns, suspicions disappear like magic from Facebook or Twitter that behind Choppard glamor of luxury watch or gifted to the famous discretion lies a regime comparable to Hitler's Germany although after a wayward princess mask some euros to pay a friendly and some complicity . Everyone knows there is always something better deals after appearances. Do not worry because today's new president , working, and while we enjoy the topology of dreams and illusions that gives us our team. Not forgetting that some things are requirements of the feeling that unites us.

Cute Picnik Quotes Anyone?

Shameful until the last minute.

Monday (Catalunya Radio, Manel Fuentes) to Friday (TV3, Lluis Canut), Sandro Rosell has gobbled up the three candidates (Ingla / Ferrer / Benedito), more ambitious in the shade (Soriano) and an outgoing president who has proven to be a banana character (Laporta) fighting until the last second by their own interests. JL's attitude is unprecedented, and hardly the will. A president who can not leave the job when touched, which acts with such bias and malice, is invalid for life. I do not know if it is finally devoted to politics or not, but any citizen with a minimum of common sense will not vote. Because you can vote for a guy like this. If you are unable to know not to leave the Nou Camp through the door that corresponds with the forms corresponding to a president, what would do inaugurated mayor / councilor or president of the Generalitat?

Laporta has been invalidated for life. Winning titles does not mean a license for everything. And JL is believed that it was the sheriff of Barcelona and Catalonia, without knowing that the owners of the West no longer exist. Enric

Llaudet has been one of the greatest presidents in the history of Barça. He lived very tough few years, without a penny in the coffers, surrounded by debts by all parties, with the worst refereeing in the history of club and paddling around the Franco government in favor of Real Madrid. Llaudet not win titles, but continued to make big / bigger still Barca. And the credit titles, out the front door of Camp Nou. What does not happen to this unpresentable president leaves us, for many titles in his time has been achieved. Laporta has been very lucky in his time. Input, have Rosell in its initial period it was who built the foundation of this team with the addition of Ronaldinho, Deco and Marquez and respect and enhance the youth emerged from the Núñez era (Valdes, Puyol, Xavi, Iniesta). Then have the luck of having a manager as he fought Murtra Evarist endlessly to make Guardiola was the first coach when Laporta did not want - "while I am no longer president" - while traveling with Txiki Ingla Mourinho looking for - "or whoever" - before seeing Guardiola on the bench.

have believed in Guardiola only three: Lluis Bassat, who also tried, unsuccessfully, to incorporate in your application Rosell, Evarist Murtra, which has always been a strong supporter of Guardiola as a player and coach ... and Sandro Rosell that passed through his mind always the idea of \u200b\u200bincorporating Barca 2003 but could not be.

A Laporta be remembered for sporting success, in spite of himself, but mostly remembered for having failed to behave like a real president. He arrived with a lie and goes with a tantrum. Regrettable. I'll stick with Llaudet.

Note.-I learn that its decision is final and unspeakable to renew the television contract for Mediapro / Jaume Roures and replace Josep Lluis Nunez name of the museum for the "Barcelona Experience." Both decisions are confirmed once again demonstrate its unclassifiable also proceed as president, as unfortunate as disgusting.

What

80's Aerobics Images Halloween

Falsify the debate begins

"In the first, which he named " the hand of God "Maradona in an impressive levitation intercepted a cross shot and slipped the ball into the net with his left fist cunningly hidden. But the "miracle damn," said Bobby Robson, was second, made minutes later. Maradona picked up a pass in his own penalty area, he lowered his head, blasted through the entire English team Shilton deceived and brought the ball in the arc. Well, in Argentina, prefer the former to the latter. "

(Martin Amis, English writer and football fan )

Everett Corrigan School

Censorship is already back here.

is the role of the press? Theoretically report / opinion. Report and comment with accuracy and transparency. But it seems that all the press is for the work. I do not say it all. I say almost all, but is growing nearly as democracy advances. For those who live in the former regime, we thought that one day be a journalist would be a wonderful thing. We dreamed of writing and / or speak freely. But freedom is collapsing. And it is collapsing four cynics who have control of almost everything and called the name of journalism make and break their cravings. Or rather, to their interests. At rotten interests. If this happens in the sport, imagine as may occur outside of sport. To start trembling.

Without going any further, three days ago just experienced another episode of what is censorship today: how a sports article disappeared by the time of publication of a journalistic medium. And he did not magically. The dictatorial decision made by a name. But more serious is that the new methods of communication , those who come to happen to the children of Gutenberg , new technologies have been introduced into our lives under the banner of freedom theoretical. False. Lie. We thought that what we read about China and / or Russia of censorship in the new technologies were not isolated cases prosper. But these acts censors have already entered, without permission, in our homes. The same article censored in the print media (which paradoxically had to be read on the competition, something unusual ) was kidnapped by Facebook , a medium that we considered free day before yesterday. But that has not happened. Facebook for the first time to our knowledge has been complicit in the censorship of the paper and together / together have tried to hijack a story. Why? By whom? "Serving whose interests?

The newspaper felt nostalgia for the Franco methods I will not ask the reason for that decision. Mine is not an issue. If anything, it would be a matter of conscience from the wording. But the newsrooms of today no longer smell to snuff and alcohol and therefore there is no ranting or riots. Now, a number of journalists coming through the door of the drawing with the swallows on. Willing to accept everything. And willing to write and / or say that black is white. And they are so wide. Only worry about the time of departure and day of collection. The dignity of the profession has become obsolete. It's a matter of the past, and what we have seen, as a matter of this as just reconfirmed Facebook that after his unfortunate and shocking case of censorship, there is still time to make a public explanation. One explanation accompanied by a resignation. But resignation important. Because someone , a person with much power, had to turn order for the item referring to a candidate for the presidency of Barcelona , Marc Ingla , "someone" wanted no published. Facebook

is indebted to millions of users. And if it is unable to give a convincing public opinion, accompanied by their resignation, we must begin to make a call to users if the censorship has also returned to the role is emerging in new technologies. Facebook has already won the honor (?) Kidnapping, and attempting to censor the first sports information Catalunya and Spain.

But Speaking of censors, there are other issues that nobody wants to address but are populi voice in the profession and also affect the presidential elections to FC Barcelona. Should members be informed of all Barca what journalists know about some candidates? Is it permissible to continue to conceal thousands of members who intend to go to the polls without knowing what is behind each candidate?
If a few days there was no shame to give echo to the blog of a journalist former Barça official, it does not miss me now explain the general Barcelona what almost all journalists are knowledgeable the adventures of a candidate. Some clues to who first drew the attention of the journalistic profession was the outgoing president and is now public domain because the individual concerned to the media asking whether you got a dossier on him. I think

before an election, they may be, the press, above all, would be in favor of transparency and tell who is who, what is good and bad, when there is bad. But the press does not letting go. It prefers to live without clarifying how much you know and let go an entire social body blind and deaf to the polls because it is the "new candidates", who managed the firms at the last minute (also tells how the hit) like him a group of journalists.

If the press does not want to open the windows to freedom, neither candidate wants to clarify and Facebook just opened censorship in our country, I believe we are experiencing a return to the past where the winners will remain forever. Poor

profession! And poor voters who will vote without knowing for whom to vote. Because neither the person requesting the ballot and the media explains not only hidden but not even ask for what you say. But for all / everything.

! Ah! and a long story longer, I shall also speak of what is said, quietly, another candidate ( Marc Ingla ) and who were his suppliers as he and Soriano sent in Barça .

Note: What I have written has nothing to do with what promised to tell the story of "the bomb." I will write. For today, enough.

Pokemon Heart Gold Desmume Mac

Pump (3) and censorship.

few days ago I announced it was launching a bomb. And I'll do it later in the day, whoever falls. This, ladies and gentlemen, is a dictatorship. The dictatorship that intend to continue maintaining the privileged few. Ones that are presented in the presidential elections of Barca and others who practice the worst forms of Franco censorious.

Mindful that will tell the story. Complete. Because the censors of the modern era not just on paper. Are also on Facebook. We're living what we call a free press ever have imagined.

Laporta has

How To Make Friendship Bracelets

Why such hatred? Gaspart

Skeletor Vs Beastman Mp3 4shared

Louise Bourgeois World