is the role of the press? Theoretically report / opinion. Report and comment with accuracy and transparency. But it seems that all the press is for the work. I do not say it all. I say almost all, but is growing nearly as democracy advances. For those who live in the former regime, we thought that one day be a journalist would be a wonderful thing. We dreamed of writing and / or speak freely. But freedom is collapsing. And it is collapsing four cynics who have control of almost everything and called the name of journalism make and break their cravings. Or rather, to their interests. At rotten interests. If this happens in the sport, imagine as may occur outside of sport. To start trembling.
Without going any further, three days ago just experienced another episode of what is censorship today: how a sports article disappeared by the time of publication of a journalistic medium. And he did not magically. The dictatorial decision made by a name. But more serious is that the new methods of communication , those who come to happen to the children of Gutenberg , new technologies have been introduced into our lives under the banner of freedom theoretical. False. Lie. We thought that what we read about China and / or Russia of censorship in the new technologies were not isolated cases prosper. But these acts censors have already entered, without permission, in our homes. The same article censored in the print media (which paradoxically had to be read on the competition, something unusual ) was kidnapped by Facebook , a medium that we considered free day before yesterday. But that has not happened. Facebook for the first time to our knowledge has been complicit in the censorship of the paper and together / together have tried to hijack a story. Why? By whom? "Serving whose interests?
The newspaper felt nostalgia for the Franco methods I will not ask the reason for that decision. Mine is not an issue. If anything, it would be a matter of conscience from the wording. But the newsrooms of today no longer smell to snuff and alcohol and therefore there is no ranting or riots. Now, a number of journalists coming through the door of the drawing with the swallows on. Willing to accept everything. And willing to write and / or say that black is white. And they are so wide. Only worry about the time of departure and day of collection. The dignity of the profession has become obsolete. It's a matter of the past, and what we have seen, as a matter of this as just reconfirmed Facebook that after his unfortunate and shocking case of censorship, there is still time to make a public explanation. One explanation accompanied by a resignation. But resignation important. Because someone , a person with much power, had to turn order for the item referring to a candidate for the presidency of Barcelona , Marc Ingla , "someone" wanted no published. Facebook
is indebted to millions of users. And if it is unable to give a convincing public opinion, accompanied by their resignation, we must begin to make a call to users if the censorship has also returned to the role is emerging in new technologies. Facebook has already won the honor (?) Kidnapping, and attempting to censor the first sports information Catalunya and Spain.
But Speaking of censors, there are other issues that nobody wants to address but are populi voice in the profession and also affect the presidential elections to FC Barcelona. Should members be informed of all Barca what journalists know about some candidates? Is it permissible to continue to conceal thousands of members who intend to go to the polls without knowing what is behind each candidate?
If a few days there was no shame to give echo to the blog of a journalist former Barça official, it does not miss me now explain the general Barcelona what almost all journalists are knowledgeable the adventures of a candidate. Some clues to who first drew the attention of the journalistic profession was the outgoing president and is now public domain because the individual concerned to the media asking whether you got a dossier on him. I think
before an election, they may be, the press, above all, would be in favor of transparency and tell who is who, what is good and bad, when there is bad. But the press does not letting go. It prefers to live without clarifying how much you know and let go an entire social body blind and deaf to the polls because it is the "new candidates", who managed the firms at the last minute (also tells how the hit) like him a group of journalists.
If the press does not want to open the windows to freedom, neither candidate wants to clarify and Facebook just opened censorship in our country, I believe we are experiencing a return to the past where the winners will remain forever. Poor
profession! And poor voters who will vote without knowing for whom to vote. Because neither the person requesting the ballot and the media explains not only hidden but not even ask for what you say. But for all / everything.
! Ah! and a long story longer, I shall also speak of what is said, quietly, another candidate ( Marc Ingla ) and who were his suppliers as he and Soriano sent in Barça .
Note: What I have written has nothing to do with what promised to tell the story of "the bomb." I will write. For today, enough.
Laporta has
