a colleague says that the outcome of the Assembly has been bad news for FC Barcelona. I think the opposite. Unmasking storytellers / liars / McCabe / golf is a good (great) news for Barça. How can you defend someone who has "looted" the club? How is it possible that journalists, some with name and prestige, some with names but with no reputation to defend the indefensible? And how can impeach a president, Sandro Rosell here for absternerse in the voting? Unbelievable. Those who criticize them for their blank ballots would have done to take a position.
there who has not mastered the "Rosell effect." There are those, yet it seems impossible for a partner, with only the support of the partner (no press) has won an election. In these gurus of the letters and the waves, everything which is not manipulated for them, they feel rejected.
rather not talk about some former executives, it seems to me equally or even more regrettable. I feel a special appreciation for Albert Perrin, for their continued Barcelona, \u200b\u200bbut I think it demonstrates a grudge, bad style, accusing Rosell "coward" and wash their hands like Pilate. Neither is a coward, as demonstrated, nor has washed her hands, and even less to divide the Barça. Those who fall are those who do not accept the verdict of the electors partners (in fact, appointed by the previous board) and those who are twenty - five years! 25 years! - Dividing the world. Just ask Nunez, for example.
Convicted by the Assembly, the first thing you need to clarify and demonstrate it in what and how they have spent the money of the club. Until you prove it, quiet / quietly, lest the members (commissioners or not) want to know more and ask more about the best years "of the lives of some."
Sometimes bad news is good news. That one would icing at home is bad news, but the authors discovered no longer a comfort.
0 comments:
Post a Comment